{"id":11865,"date":"2026-04-29T20:10:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T20:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/?p=11865"},"modified":"2026-04-29T20:10:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T20:10:43","slug":"nvidia-vp-says-ai-is-more-expensive-than-hiring-human-workers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/?p=11865","title":{"rendered":"Nvidia VP Says AI Is More Expensive Than Hiring Human Workers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"tw:border-b tw:border-slate-200 tw:pb-4\">\n<h2 class=\"tw:mt-0 tw:mb-1 tw:text-2xl tw:font-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"tw:font-normal tw:font-serif tw:text-base tw:marker:text-slate-400\">\n<li>Nvidia vice president Bryan Catanzaro says that for his team, AI compute now costs more than the employees using it, making AI more expensive than human labor.<\/li>\n<li>A 2024 MIT study finds AI automation is economically viable in only about 23% of jobs, with humans still cheaper in the remaining 77%.<\/li>\n<li>Despite unclear productivity gains and high costs, big tech companies have committed around $740 billion to AI-related expenses this year, a 69% jump from 2025.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p>A key Nvidia executive says that AI isn\u2019t reducing labor costs \u2014\u00a0right now, it\u2019s actually more expensive than the human workers that companies already have.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees,\u201d Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, recently <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2026\/04\/26\/ai-cost-human-workers\">told Axios<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Bryan Catanzaro. (Photo by Big Event Media\/Getty Images for HumanX Conference)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.csail.mit.edu\/news\/rethinking-ais-impact-mit-csail-study-reveals-economic-limits-job-automation\">2024 MIT study<\/a> supports this view. Researchers looked at what it would take for AI systems to match human performance across different jobs and found that automation made financial sense in just 23% of roles that rely heavily on visual tasks. In the other 77% of cases, keeping human workers was still the more cost-effective option.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>There are also examples of AI making costly errors. In one case, an engineer said an AI tool <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/03\/18\/ai-coding-risks-amazon-agents-enterprise\/\">wiped out<\/a> his database and network.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-companies-are-investing-in-ai\">Companies are investing in AI<\/h2>\n<p>Despite the drawbacks of AI, big tech companies are still investing heavily in it. According to Morgan Stanley, tech firms have already committed about <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.morganstanley.com\/insights\/articles\/ai-capex-740-billion-banking-opportunity\">$740 billion<\/a> to AI-related spending this year, a 69% increase from 2025. Over just the past year, fees for AI software have also gone up sharply, increasing by <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicapp.io\/blog\/ai-tax\">20% to 37%<\/a>, according to spending management company Tropic.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>AI spending is rising quickly. Based on McKinsey estimates, it could reach<a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/industries\/technology-media-and-telecommunications\/our-insights\/the-cost-of-compute-a-7-trillion-dollar-race-to-scale-data-centers\"> $5.2 trillion<\/a> by 2033, including about $1.6 trillion for data centers and $3.3 trillion for IT hardware.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The scale of that investment is so large that some companies are now reconsidering how they allocate their budgets. For example, Uber\u2019s chief technology officer, Praveen Neppalli Naga, told <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theinformation.com\/newsletters\/applied-ai\/uber-cto-shows-claude-code-can-blow-ai-budgets\">The Information<\/a> earlier this month that the company\u2019s shift toward AI coding tools is driving up costs. \u201cI\u2019m back to the drawing board because the budget I thought I would need is blown away already,\u201d he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-tech-layoffs-are-on-the-rise\">Tech layoffs are on the rise<\/h2>\n<p>As companies increase AI spending, layoffs across the tech industry have been rising. Data from layoff tracker <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/layoffs.fyi\/\">Layoffs.fyi<\/a> shows that more than 92,000 tech workers have already lost their jobs this year, spanning nearly 100 companies. That pace is much faster than last year, when roughly 120,000 layoffs occurred over the entire year.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Keith Lee, an AI and finance professor at the Swiss Institute of Artificial Intelligence\u2019s Gordon School of Business, told <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/2026\/04\/28\/nvidia-executive-cost-of-ai-is-greater-than-cost-of-employees\/\">Fortune<\/a> that companies are spending huge amounts on AI, even though human workers are currently cheaper for many tasks. There\u2019s a gap between what makes financial sense on paper and what companies are actually doing. \u201cWhat we\u2019re seeing is a short-term mismatch,\u201d Lee told the outlet.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>AI may be more expensive than human workers right now, but that could change. Lee says the economics will shift as the cost of running AI models drops and infrastructure improves. He added that AI will only become truly cost-effective if it proves reliable and needs less human supervision.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not just about AI becoming cheaper than humans,\u201d Lee told Fortune. \u201cIt\u2019s about becoming both cheaper and more predictable at scale.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"tw:border-b tw:border-slate-200 tw:pb-4\">\n<h2 class=\"tw:mt-0 tw:mb-1 tw:text-2xl tw:font-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"tw:font-normal tw:font-serif tw:text-base tw:marker:text-slate-400\">\n<li>Nvidia vice president Bryan Catanzaro says that for his team, AI compute now costs more than the employees using it, making AI more expensive than human labor.<\/li>\n<li>A 2024 MIT study finds AI automation is economically viable in only about 23% of jobs, with humans still cheaper in the remaining 77%.<\/li>\n<li>Despite unclear productivity gains and high costs, big tech companies have committed around $740 billion to AI-related expenses this year, a 69% jump from 2025.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p>A key Nvidia executive says that AI isn\u2019t reducing labor costs \u2014\u00a0right now, it\u2019s actually more expensive than the human workers that companies already have.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees,\u201d Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, recently <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2026\/04\/26\/ai-cost-human-workers\">told Axios<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"683\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?w=1024\" alt=\"SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 06: Bryan Catanzaro speaks onstage during the &quot;AI is a 5 Layer Cake&quot; panel at the HumanX Conference San Franciso 2026 at Moscone Center South on April 06, 2026 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Big Event Media\/Getty Images for HumanX Conference)\" class=\"wp-image-426695\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg 3000w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=1024,683 1024w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=1536,1024 1536w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=2048,1365 2048w, https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2026\/04\/Bryan-GettyImages-2270143685.jpg?resize=338,225 338w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Bryan Catanzaro. (Photo by Big Event Media\/Getty Images for HumanX Conference)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.csail.mit.edu\/news\/rethinking-ais-impact-mit-csail-study-reveals-economic-limits-job-automation\">2024 MIT study<\/a> supports this view. Researchers looked at what it would take for AI systems to match human performance across different jobs and found that automation made financial sense in just 23% of roles that rely heavily on visual tasks. In the other 77% of cases, keeping human workers was still the more cost-effective option.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.entrepreneur.com\/business-news\/nvidia-vp-says-it-costs-more-to-use-ai-than-to-hire-humans\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Takeaways Nvidia vice president Bryan Catanzaro says that for his team, AI compute now costs more than the employees using it, making AI more expensive than human labor. A 2024 MIT study finds AI automation is economically viable in only about 23% of jobs, with humans still cheaper in the remaining 77%. Despite unclear<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11866,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-11865","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-green-brands"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11865\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/11866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}