{"id":13469,"date":"2026-05-20T23:42:27","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T23:42:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/?p=13469"},"modified":"2026-05-20T23:42:27","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T23:42:27","slug":"this-map-shows-how-your-representatives-voted-on-public-lands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/?p=13469","title":{"rendered":"This Map Shows How Your Representatives Voted on Public Lands"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"justify-start\">\n<nav class=\"align-left col-span-full mb-base\" data-pom-e2e-test-id=\"breadcrumbs\"\/>\n<p>A new accountability tool shows exactly how every member of Congress voted on national parks, forests, and wilderness areas\u2014stripping away the political noise. Here\u2019s how to see whether your representatives are in support of public lands.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/p>\n<p class=\"fp-leadCaption py-tight text-left font-utility text-utility3-size leading-utility3-line-height text-secondary\">Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is the latest public land area to face a potential rollback of protections<!-- --> (Photo: The Good Brigade\/Getty Images)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"article-body\">\n<p>Published May 20, 2026 04:41PM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Over the last year, the Trump administration implemented sweeping changes to public lands, from stripping protections and opening areas to oil and gas drilling,\u00a0to laying off thousands of federal government workers on the frontlines. Now, a new tool aims to hold Congress accountable for its voting record.<\/p>\n<p>The <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"text-brand-primary underline hover:text-brand-primary\/85 break-words overflow-wrap-anywhere underline-offset-[3px]\" rel=\"noopener\" data-afl-p=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/morethanjustparks.com\/congressional-public-lands-score\/\">Congressional Public Lands Score<\/a> tracks how every U.S. representative or senator voted on issues impacting America\u2019s national parks, forests, monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges. The free interactive map helps users track where their Congressional lawmakers stand on public lands issues.<\/p>\n<p>Brothers Jim and Will Pattiz, founders of the public-lands-focused advocacy group <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"text-brand-primary underline hover:text-brand-primary\/85 break-words overflow-wrap-anywhere underline-offset-[3px]\" rel=\"noopener\" data-afl-p=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/morethanjustparks.com\/\">More Than Just Parks<\/a>, created the tool. They told <em>Outside<\/em> that their tracker went live on April 22 and has cataloged every vote in the 119th Congress, which convened on January 3, 2025. Voters can turn to the map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, which begin in November.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe decided we needed to take on a really active, aggressive advocacy role for our public lands,\u201d Jim Pattiz told <em>Outside<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>The Congressional Public Lands Score Grades Congress<\/h2>\n<p>The program gives each elected official a letter grade from A to F\u00a0based on their voting record, which is then visualized on a map. A specially designed program automatically tracks each congressperson\u2019s vote, flagging it as either in support of or in opposition to a public lands issue. Users can then scroll through the map or search for their representative directly by name, state, or zip code.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to logging each legislator\u2019s voting record, the website also includes a legislative watch section that analyzes legislation that has been or will be voted on, explains the bill\u2019s status, and outlines what could happen to public lands\u00a0if it passes. States are also scored on how well their delegation is perceived to support public lands policies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe simple version is, does this vote affect whether lands stay public, protected, properly funded, and managed by competent agencies?\u201d Jim Pattiz told <em>Outside<\/em>. \u201cVotes that affect any of those four are going to be counted as a public lands vote.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The brothers believe that weighted issues include bills, resolutions, and executive actions that shape public lands policy.\u00a0According to the tool\u2019s methodology, rankings are nonpartisan and assign equal value to each scored vote. A member\u2019s score equals the percentage of scored votes cast in favor of public lands protection.<\/p>\n<p>Users can also rank their elected officials by their support for public lands and filter for those up for reelection in 2026.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2742312\" class=\"pom-image-wrap photo-alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"A map of the u.s. shows how senate members voted and what their grade scores are based on red (f) green (a)\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1594\" height=\"1052\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2742312\" style=\"color:transparent\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.outsideonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/senate-map.png?width=1920&amp;auto=webp&amp;quality=75&amp;fit=cover 1x, https:\/\/cdn.outsideonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/senate-map.png?width=3840&amp;auto=webp&amp;quality=75&amp;fit=cover 2x\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.outsideonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/senate-map.png?width=3840&amp;auto=webp&amp;quality=75&amp;fit=cover\"\/><figcaption class=\"pom-caption\"><span class=\"article__caption\">Each elected official is given a letter grade based on their voting record, which is visualized on a map in red (F grade), green (A grade) or somewhere in between<\/span> (Photo: More Than Just Parks)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>How Did Your Representative Vote?<\/h2>\n<p>Nine senators, all of whom are Democrats, currently hold an A+ rating for voting in support of public lands 100 percent of the time. In contrast, 54 senators have earned an F rating for voting against public lands most of the time. Every F-rated senator is a Republican.<\/p>\n<p>The brothers say their tool is nonpartisan and reflects trends in how each party votes on policies that impact public lands protections.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes, it\u2019s largely Democrats on the one side and largely Republicans on the other, but that\u2019s just the way it is,\u201d Jim Pattiz said. \u201cIt might look like this is a partisan thing, but the facts are facts, and they\u2019re there, and they\u2019re well supported.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The tool has also revealed surprising trends across the U.S. The Mountain West, for example, is largely conservative, but it is also a region with extensive public lands, and conservative voters there tend to support their protection.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor Mountain West voters, public lands are one of the top issues, unlike most of the rest of the country,\u201d Will Pattiz said. \u201cThat is one region where this tool is going to be extremely useful. It lets voters see, \u2018Hey, wait a minute, I voted for you because you were carrying a gun and you were walking in the woods, but what the hell is this vote?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Tracking Public Lands Issues<\/h2>\n<p>It\u2019s hardly the first map or interactive tool designed to document changes in the public lands arena. In March, <em>Outside<\/em> reported on an interactive map tracking all the national park signs slated for removal. The More Than Just Parks website hosts another interactive map of threatened public lands, and other groups, like the League of Conservation Voters, offer broader environmental voting scorecards, but this new tool is the first to specifically look at voting records on public lands.<\/p>\n<p>The Pattiz brothers told <em>Outside<\/em> they hope that the tool will empower outdoor recreationists to hold politicians accountable at the ballot box.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI encourage folks to go look in there and see for themselves and see if they find anything that surprises them,\u201d Will Pattiz said. If the tool works as intended, the brothers hope those surprises won\u2019t just spark frustration, but a voting bloc dedicated to keeping the nation\u2019s wild spaces intact for the next generation.<\/p>\n<p><!-- --><\/p>\n<section id=\"\" class=\"content-card rounded-xl px-base-loose pt-base-loose pb-loose shadow-sm shadow-black\/10\">\n<h2>Key Findings from the Congressional Public Lands Score Analysis<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Eight Congressional Review Act resolutions targeting public lands protections were signed into law in a single session, with a ninth pending.<\/li>\n<li>11 senators voted against public lands on every single scored vote.<\/li>\n<li>20 F-rated senators are up for reelection in 2026.<\/li>\n<li>18 votes were scored in the Senate and 17 in the House across CRA resolutions, bills, amendments, and confirmations.<\/li>\n<li>Every score traces to an official roll call record on senate.gov or clerk.house.gov.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- --><\/section>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.outsideonline.com\/outdoor-adventure\/environment\/congressional-public-lands-scorecard\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new accountability tool shows exactly how every member of Congress voted on national parks, forests, and wilderness areas\u2014stripping away the political noise. Here\u2019s how to see whether your representatives are in support of public lands. Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument is the latest public land area to face a potential rollback of protections (Photo: The<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13470,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-wild-living"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13469\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wildgreenquest.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}