Published September 4, 2026 01:38PM<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
On the evening of August 31, a bear attacked a woman<\/a> walking with her dog in Columbia Falls, Montana, a small town just outside of Glacier National Park. According to Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP), the woman\u00a0sustained significant injuries and was transferred to a medical facility for treatment.<\/p>\n The attack marks the latest in a long list of bear run-ins across North America this summer. Experts say that human-bear encounters have been higher in 2026 than in recent years.<\/p>\n \u201cEspecially with black bears, we\u2019ve definitely seen an uptick in their activity and subsequent conflict activity across the state,\u201d Dan Thompson, large carnivore biologist with the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, told Outside<\/em>.<\/p>\n Bears have already killed two people this year. Anthony Pollio, 33, died while hiking in Glacier National Park in May. A black bear attacked and killed<\/a> a New Mexico man in August, marking the state\u2019s second bear attack on record. A grizzly attacked two Yellowstone hikers, a Wyoming woman was bitten in the butt by a black bear, an Alaska woman fended off a grizzly using jiu-jitsu<\/a>, and a black bear charged a group of students<\/a> in Washington State.<\/p>\n It seems the bears are everywhere.<\/p>\n Thompson attributes the heightened bear activity to a one-two punch of weather extremes: an unusually low snowpack across the West last winter, followed by scorching summer temperatures.<\/p>\n Together, those conditions have diminished the natural food sources bears rely on, including the berries, fruits, nuts, and grasses that make up the bulk of their diet. With less food available in the wild, more bears are venturing beyond their usual habitat and into neighborhoods in search of an easier meal.<\/p>\n \u201cHuman-bear conflicts in general tend to increase when there are shortages of natural bear foods,\u201d Frank van Manen<\/a>, a bear expert and emeritus ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, told Outside.<\/em> \u201cIt is possible that conflicts suddenly drop off if high-calorie foods that bears pursue in the fall are abundant. In areas where such foods are in low supply, human-bear conflicts may intensify.\u201d<\/p>\n Montana, home to nearly two-thirds of grizzly bears in the Lower 48, has reported 194 grizzly conflicts so far in 2026, and another 250 black bear-related incidents, according to Montana FWP data<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cThis year is panning out to be one of the worst natural food failure years on record,\u201d Jamie Jonkel, Montana FWP bear conflict specialist, said in a statement<\/a>. \u201cOur regional bear team is working around the clock, and we are asking the public to be patient and to please be diligent with containing all attractants.\u201d<\/p>\n In Colorado, the state confirmed five black bear attacks amid an all-time high of more than 8,600 sightings, more than double the number of sightings in 2025<\/a>. Connecticut wildlife officials reported that over 50 bears<\/a> have entered homes. There have been at least 168 black bear incidents<\/a> this year in Utah\u2014also twice the amount from the previous year\u2014and another 187 in New Mexico<\/a>.<\/p>\n Bear populations in some areas are also rebounding<\/a>, moving beyond their recovery zones, and this year\u2019s low food supply has only compounded those pressures.<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s no silver bullet, no divine answer for why exactly,\u201d Thompson said. \u201cIt\u2019s a combination of factors: the lack of winter in other areas, moisture turning into a lot of heat, early blooms that froze and reduced the berry crop, and increased human use of these areas.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Vocabulary matters when you\u2019re talking about bear data. Here\u2019s how the experts distinguish between different events.<\/p>\n <\/section>\n Data suggests that brown bear attacks are rising around the world. According to a 2019 study<\/a>, between 2000 and 2015 there were 183 attacks in North America, averaging 11 every year. Most of these victims were lone males recreating outside.<\/p>\n Research on U.S. bear attacks is consistent with these numbers. Between 1990 and 2019, North American black and grizzly bears have killed at least 150 people<\/a>, and more people have died in recent decades<\/a> than a century ago. Scientists involved in the studies concluded that\u2019s partly because far more people may be encountering bears.<\/p>\n As remote bear territory diminishes, these encounters are even more likely to rise. Cody Miller, a wildlife scientist at Brigham Young University in Utah, wrote<\/a> in his 2024 study that human\u2013bear conflicts are still rare, but increasing at a steady rate because more people are hiking, camping, and hunting than ever before.\u00a0Van Manen adds that more people in the landscape also increases the likelihood that bears encounter and pursue human foods, like garbage left behind at camp.<\/p>\n Grizzlies account for more conflicts than black bears and are more likely to injure people, Miller concluded. Interestingly, though, black bear conflicts are more likely to be fatal.<\/p>\n Most of these incidents began as surprise encounters, as with Pollio in Glacier.<\/p>\n Van Manen cautions that although 2026 appears to be an unusually active year for encounters, it doesn\u2019t necessarily mean that fatal bear attacks are on the rise\u2014such a trend takes years of data to establish.<\/p>\n \u201cBecause of the rarity of these events, comparisons of a single year with a ten-year average are not meaningful,\u201d van Manen said. \u201cDecadal comparisons for North America do not suggest distinct trends.\u201d<\/p>\n According to van Manen, grizzly bears killed 17 people in the United States during the 2010s, and 14 in the 2020s so far. American black bears, by comparison, killed ten people in the 2010s and 13 so far in the 2020s. Since 1892, researchers have documented 20 fatal attacks in the Greater Yellowstone area; some years have more, others less.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is an example of how unpredictable these events are: there was a fatality in 1986 followed by a 25-year period with no fatal incidents and then several years with multiple incidents,\u201d van Manen said. Nationwide tracking doesn\u2019t exist\u2014states hold the data\u2014and establishing a full, nationwide picture of bear deaths is challenging.<\/p>\n Chris Servheen, the former national grizzly bear recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, told Outside<\/em> that statistically speaking, a grizzly kills less than one person\u00a0annually, on average.<\/p>\n Even one death is a tragedy, and most fatal attacks are purely coincidental, van Manen adds.<\/p>\n \u201cThese are chance events that are driven by human and bear numbers: in areas with increasing and expanding bear populations,\u201d he said. \u201cCombined with increases in recreational visits, the chance of a bear encounter that may end in a physical attack increases as well, however small that may be.\u201d<\/p>\n But all that could change as we head into the fall months. As more people move into bear country, and more bears come into towns looking for food, conflicts are sure to increase.<\/p>\n Late summer and early autumn bring hyperphagia, a period during which bears spend almost all their time consuming calories to build fat reserves for winter. As more bears spend more time looking for food, the chances of people coming across them during fall hikes or bike rides increase.<\/p>\n Nathaniel Bowersock is a biologist who spent nearly a decade working with bears in Yellowstone National Park. He is now a black bear specialist in Missouri and works with Bearwise<\/a>, an interstate organization dedicated to mitigating human-bear conflict. He says the most important thing hikers can do is bring bear spray.<\/p>\n \u201cBear spray continues to be shown to be an effective tool at deterring or lessening an encounter with a bear, both black bears and grizzly bears, and bear spray will work under many conditions, even on a windy day,\u201d Bowersock told Outside<\/em>. \u201cIn addition, bear spray has been found to be more effective than a firearm at deterring a bear encounter, and bear spray is easier to use than a firearm. Therefore, any time someone is looking to recreate in grizzly country, I strongly suggest they carry bear spray.\u201d<\/p>\n And if you see something, say something.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have a lot of bears that don\u2019t get reported until it\u2019s too late, or until their behavior is at a level that we can\u2019t tolerate from a human safety standpoint,\u201d Thompson said. \u201cDon\u2019t let garbage be available. Don\u2019t let food be available. Bring in pet food. When you\u2019re camping, make sure you\u2019re keeping a clean camp.\u201d<\/p>\nIncreased Bear Conflicts Driven by Environmental Pressures<\/h2>\n
What Is a Bear Attack, Exactly?<\/h2>\n
\n
Bear Encounters Are Rising Globally, Too<\/h2>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/cdn.outsideonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/GettyImages-2046824925.jpg?width=3840&auto=webp&quality=75&fit=cover\"\/)
Are Fatal Bear Attacks Increasing Too?<\/h2>\n
![\"Wild](\"https:\/\/cdn.outsideonline.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/GettyImages-2284602247.jpg?width=2048&auto=webp&quality=75&fit=cover\"\/)
More Activity Expected As We Head Into Hyperphagia<\/h2>\n