Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Jury Says Ticketmaster ‘Robbed Fans Blind’ — What This Means

    April 16, 2026

    Starbucks’s ChatGPT experiment could quietly reshape how people order coffee

    April 15, 2026

    Windows 11 Pro is Now Less Than $15

    April 15, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Green Brands
    • Wild Living
    • Green Fitness
    • Brand Spotlights
    • About Us
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Home»Brand Spotlights»Duolingo was evaluating its workers’ AI use. Workers pushed back.
    Brand Spotlights

    Duolingo was evaluating its workers’ AI use. Workers pushed back.

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comBy wildgreenquest@gmail.comApril 15, 2026003 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link



    After introducing a new strategy for performance reviews to include evaluations of how effectively workers use AI, Duolingo founder and CEO Luis von Ahn said employees started questioning the decision: “For a while,” von Ahn said, AI usage was a metric of company performance reviews. 

    But it won’t be anymore, once employees pushed back. Now, Duolingo has backtracked on using AI use as a performance metric.

    Employees had asked if they were simply using AI for AI’s sake. “At the end, we backtracked, and we said, ‘No, look. The most important thing in your performance is you are doing whatever your job is as well as possible,’” von Ahn said in a recent episode of the “Silicon Valley Girl” podcast. 

    “A lot of times AI can help you with that, but if it can’t, I’m not going to force you to do that. […] It felt like rather than being held accountable for the actual outcome, we were trying to push something that in some cases did not fit.”

    It’s not the first time the company has backtracked on its AI policies. Last April, von Ahn announced that Duolingo would become an “AI-first” company, even urging teams against hiring more employees unless the team could not automate their work. With the use of AI tools, Duolingo was able to introduce 148 new language courses. But a week and some major social media backlash later, von Ahn backtracked on those comments, and wrote in a LinkedIn post that he doesn’t view AI as a replacement for Duolingo employees.

    In the recent podcast episode, von Ahn seemed to maintain that belief. “Despite what the internet may think, we’ve never done a layoff here,” he said. “The way I see it, a single employee is just way more productive now than they used to be.”

    While von Ahn said that Duolingo staff have become better at leveraging AI, there are some cases in which AI does the opposite of boosting productivity. For example, AI tools are not all that great at generating a large number of narratives, often coming up with things that don’t make any sense, he said. Additionally, von Ahn said that “it’s not yet the case” that AI can code better than humans. In many cases, the tech doesn’t always work well when it comes to programming and when mistakes are inevitably made, they take longer to identify and debug. 

    “The happy path is really fast,” von Ahn said. “But the unhappy path makes it so that it takes so long that you end up spending more effort on that than the time you saved on the other thing.”

    Duolingo did not respond to Fast Company’s request for comment.

    Duolingo stock (Nasdaq: DUOL) experienced a high point in 2025, but fell earlier this year. While the company crossed the $1 billion revenue mark last year, Duolingo said it expects 25% revenue growth in Q1 to $288.5 million—which falls well below Wall Street estimates. The company announced in a press release that it would announce its first quarter results on May 4.



    Source link

    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    wildgreenquest@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Starbucks’s ChatGPT experiment could quietly reshape how people order coffee

    April 15, 2026

    Is organic music discovery dead? Geese ‘psyop’ debate leaves artists frustrated by growing barrier to entry

    April 15, 2026

    SantaCon president stole millions in charitable donations to fund luxury lifestyle, says FBI

    April 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Best Road Running Shoes (Spring 2026): Over 100 Shoes Tested

    March 25, 20264 Views

    Secrets of the Blue Zones. My Summary

    March 17, 20264 Views

    Is One-Rep Max Testing Necessary? Why Science Says It’s Overrated.

    April 2, 20263 Views
    Latest Reviews
    8.5

    Pico 4 Review: Should You Actually Buy One Instead Of Quest 2?

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.1

    A Review of the Venus Optics Argus 18mm f/0.95 MFT APO Lens

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.3

    DJI Avata Review: Immersive FPV Flying For Drone Enthusiasts

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.