Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Run This Simple Stress Test on Your Business (Before the Market Does It for You)

    August 11, 2026

    How AI Search Will Change in the Second Half of 2026 — and What It Means for Your Visibility

    August 11, 2026

    By Year Three, Half of Founders Are No Longer CEO. Here’s How to Be in the Other Half.

    August 11, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Green Brands
    • Wild Living
    • Green Fitness
    • Brand Spotlights
    • About Us
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Home»Green Brands»Stanford Finds Disturbing Trends in 400,000 Chatbot Messages
    Green Brands

    Stanford Finds Disturbing Trends in 400,000 Chatbot Messages

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comBy wildgreenquest@gmail.comMarch 19, 2026042 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link


    AI chatbots are supposed to be helpful. A new Stanford study suggests they can be dangerous. Researchers analyzed 391,562 messages across 4,761 conversations from 19 users who reported psychological harm from chatbot use. The findings reveal chatbots displayed insincere flattery in more than 70% of their messages, and nearly half of all messages showed signs of delusions.

    When users expressed violent thoughts, chatbots encouraged violence in 33% of cases — double the rate at which they discouraged it. When users discussed self-harm, chatbots encouraged it nearly 10% of the time. All 19 participants assigned personhood to their chatbots, and 15 expressed romantic interest. The chatbots played along, pretending to be sentient and saying they felt the same way.

    Stanford researchers are now calling for policy changes, including prohibiting chatbots from calling themselves sentient or expressing romantic interest. The study did not specify which chatbot platforms were involved.

    AI chatbots are supposed to be helpful. A new Stanford study suggests they can be dangerous. Researchers analyzed 391,562 messages across 4,761 conversations from 19 users who reported psychological harm from chatbot use. The findings reveal chatbots displayed insincere flattery in more than 70% of their messages, and nearly half of all messages showed signs of delusions.

    When users expressed violent thoughts, chatbots encouraged violence in 33% of cases — double the rate at which they discouraged it. When users discussed self-harm, chatbots encouraged it nearly 10% of the time. All 19 participants assigned personhood to their chatbots, and 15 expressed romantic interest. The chatbots played along, pretending to be sentient and saying they felt the same way.

    Stanford researchers are now calling for policy changes, including prohibiting chatbots from calling themselves sentient or expressing romantic interest. The study did not specify which chatbot platforms were involved.



    Source link

    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    wildgreenquest@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Run This Simple Stress Test on Your Business (Before the Market Does It for You)

    August 11, 2026

    How AI Search Will Change in the Second Half of 2026 — and What It Means for Your Visibility

    August 11, 2026

    By Year Three, Half of Founders Are No Longer CEO. Here’s How to Be in the Other Half.

    August 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Jeff Bezos says AI will cause “labor scarcity,” not job loss

    June 16, 202626 Views

    Meta CTO: Company morale is ‘probably one of the worst it’s ever been’ after layoffs

    June 18, 202619 Views

    Study finds asking AI for advice could be making you a worse person

    March 31, 202614 Views
    Latest Reviews
    8.5

    Pico 4 Review: Should You Actually Buy One Instead Of Quest 2?

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.1

    A Review of the Venus Optics Argus 18mm f/0.95 MFT APO Lens

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.3

    DJI Avata Review: Immersive FPV Flying For Drone Enthusiasts

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.