Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    AI and job searching: Here’s what to do and not to do

    March 27, 2026

    DoorDash Now Paying Gig Workers for Data Collection Tasks

    March 27, 2026

    Musk vs. the ‘like’ button: Tesla CEO challenges judge over LinkedIn activity

    March 27, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Green Brands
    • Wild Living
    • Green Fitness
    • Brand Spotlights
    • About Us
    Live Wild Feel Well
    Home»Brand Spotlights»Musk vs. the ‘like’ button: Tesla CEO challenges judge over LinkedIn activity
    Brand Spotlights

    Musk vs. the ‘like’ button: Tesla CEO challenges judge over LinkedIn activity

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comBy wildgreenquest@gmail.comMarch 27, 2026003 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link



    Be careful what you like on social media—you never know when a billionaire’s lawyers might be going over your reactions with a fine-tooth comb.

    Elon Musk’s lawyers requested that a judge with a history of presiding over his legal battles step aside this week. The reason? A post she liked on LinkedIn. In a motion for recusal, Musk’s legal team requested that Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick remove herself from a pair of Tesla lawsuits to “avoid an appearance of bias.”

    The post in question celebrated a verdict in a San Francisco federal court that found Musk defrauded Twitter investors in the chaotic days before he bought the social network. In the filing, Musk’s legal team claims that the post went beyond normal criticism into “inflammatory” territory by “instructing Mr. Musk and his attorneys at Quinn Emanuel to be ‘deeply ashamed,’ sneering at Mr. Musk and his attorneys for an adverse multibillion-dollar jury verdict, and cheering a facile nonjudicial notion of justice: ‘the little guy’ prevailing over ‘the richest man in the world.’” 

    As he began his bid for Twitter, Musk made a series of public pronouncements about the social network’s spam problem—a well-known issue, not a new one—and claimed the deal was on ice until the company’s leadership could prove that its spam and bot rates matched SEC disclosures. At the time, Musk’s sudden criticism of the company he sought to buy caused Twitter shares to plunge, essentially putting the company on clearance. A lot is on the line for Musk, at least by anyone else’s monetary standards: The damages in that case could add up to $2.6 billion.

    In an included screenshot of McCormick’s LinkedIn profile, the judge’s account is listed as “supporting” the post, indicating that she clicked an emoji of a hand holding a heart in reaction to it. McCormick claims that the emoji reaction was potentially accidental, but she maintains that she didn’t click the icon at all and had reported suspicious activity to the platform, locking her account in the process. “I also have not read the post, aside from the text visible in the screenshot that was sent by text to me last night,” McCormick wrote in a filing acknowledging the motion for recusal. 

    It’s not surprising that Musk’s legal team would take the unusual step of accusing McCormick of firing off a biased emoji to get some distance from the Delaware judge. She has a history of issuing Musk stinging legal losses—and Musk has a long history of being enraged by them. In early 2024, the Delaware judge ruled that Musk shouldn’t receive a Tesla pay package worth north of $55 billion, though the court later reversed that decision. McCormick is still assigned to a handful of high-profile Tesla cases from the years before Musk’s businesses fled the state for greener, friendlier legal pastures in Texas.

    “SpaceX has moved its state of incorporation from Delaware to Texas!” Musk wrote on X in early 2024. “If your company is still incorporated in Delaware, I recommend moving to another state as soon as possible.”



    Source link

    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    wildgreenquest@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    AI and job searching: Here’s what to do and not to do

    March 27, 2026

    TSA lines are chaos—and this $209 airport hack is exploding right now

    March 27, 2026

    The future of AI is already in your hands

    March 27, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Secrets of the Blue Zones. My Summary

    March 17, 20264 Views

    ‘Proud to tell you he didn’t watch it’: One person killed the ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ reboot, reveals Sarah Michelle Gellar

    March 17, 20262 Views

    You’re suddenly told to WFH tomorrow. Are you about to get fired over Zoom?

    March 26, 20261 Views
    Latest Reviews
    8.5

    Pico 4 Review: Should You Actually Buy One Instead Of Quest 2?

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.1

    A Review of the Venus Optics Argus 18mm f/0.95 MFT APO Lens

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    8.3

    DJI Avata Review: Immersive FPV Flying For Drone Enthusiasts

    wildgreenquest@gmail.comJanuary 15, 2021
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Demo
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.